In the wake of the April 2019 fire that devastated Notre Dame, the French president Emmanuel Macron promised that the monument would be rebuilt with a âcontemporary gestureâ.
There followed all manner of madcap ideas: a glass spire; a 300ft Âcarbon-fibre flame; a swimming pool on the roof; a covered garden. In the end, Notre Dame was restored to its original former glory and ceremonially reopened this month. Now, however, the planned âcontemporary gestureâ has been revealed â and has sparked a bitter row.
The French artist Claire Tabouret has been chosen to design new stained glass windows depicting Pentecostal scenes, to be installed in the chapels on the south side of the medieval church. Tabouret was among 100 artists who took part in a competition to replace the existing six windows installed by architect Eugène Viollet-le-Duc in 1844 â even though the windows were not damaged in the 2019 fire.
Designs submitted by Tabouret, 43, a figurative artist whose work featured in the Vatican pavilion at the Venice Biennale this year and who now lives in Los Angeles, show scenes of people in prayer in shades of red, turquoise, yellow and pink. She will work with master glassmakers at the Atelier Simon-Marq, a glass workshop founded in Reims in 1640, to recreate the drawings in glass.
The plan to replace the 19th-century chapel windows, which feature geometric designs described as having more historic than aesthetic value, has enraged critics. The 1964 Venice Charter, which codifies guidelines for preserving French buildings, states: âItems of sculpture, painting or decoration which form an integral part of a monument may only be removed if this is the sole means of ensuring their preservation,â and that âthe valid contributions of all periods to the building of a monument must be respectedâ.
In July, the national committee for heritage and architecture at Franceâs ministry of culture unanimously opposed the plan to remove Viollet-le-Ducâs windows, prompting one artist to withdraw his designs from the competition. The Académie des Beaux-Arts has also opposed the replacing of the windows. In a statement last year, it wrote: â[The members of the academy] are concerned that the announcement of a competition for the creation of contemporary stained glass windows, which they support in principle, involves replacing the non-figurative windows … The fire spared these windows.
âThe Académie des Beaux-Arts hopes that other locations, starting with the North Tower, will be considered for this commission for contemporary stained glass.â
However, the plan, expected to cost more than â¬4m (£3.3m), has the approval of the president, the archbishop of Paris, Laurent Ulrich, and the church authorities.
At a press conference after the announcement of her selection, Tabouret, a graduate of Parisâs prestigious Ãcole Nationale Supérieure des Beaux-Arts, said she was âexcitedâ by the challenge but aware of the controversy. âIâve read about the different opinions of people because I want to understand their arguments and also to take an approach that is open and two-way. I find it a fascinating debate,â she said. She wanted to create stained glass windows that would have âthe right presence ⦠without imposing themselves on visitorsâ.
Didier Rykner, a French journalist, art historian and founder of La Tribune de lâArt, a magazine dedicated to preserving Franceâs heritage, has described the idea of replacing the windows as âtotally ludicrousâ. He has launched a petition against the plan that has almost 250,000 signatures.
âThe president of the republic has decided on his own, without any regard for the heritage law or Notre Dame cathedral in Paris, to replace the stained glass windows in six out of the seven chapels on the south aisle with contemporary creations, after organising a competition,â it reads.
âThe stained glass windows in Notre Dame designed by Viollet-le-Duc were created as a coherent whole. It is a genuine creation that the architect wanted to be faithful to the cathedralâs gothic origins. Who gave the head of state a mandate to alter a cathedral that does not belong to him, but to everyone?
âEmmanuel Macron wants to put the stamp of the 21st century on Notre Dame de Paris. Perhaps a little modesty would be preferable.â
The French heritage association Sites & Monuments has threatened legal action if the plan to remove Viollet-le-Ducâs windows goes ahead.
Rykner told the Observer: âTo remove windows that survived the fire undamaged and replace them with others is just absurd. I am not against contemporary windows per se but there is just no reason to replace these windows. Besides, money donated by people to renovate Notre Dame has already been spent on cleaning them.
âItâs absolutely ridiculous. Weâve been told they will put the Viollet-le-Duc windows on display in a museum. They donât belong in a museum â they belong in Notre Dame. It makes no sense for them to be on display anywhere other than the cathedral. Their only interest is in situ.â
He added: âI donât see why Macron has such a say over what happens to a heritage building. This is just a vanity project.
âAs for the church authorities approving this â we should remember that the greatest vandalism done to French churches and religious buildings in the 60s and 70s was carried out ⦠by the church. They have no taste.â
Stéphane Bern, Macronâs former heritage tsar, voiced his opposition to the plan in an interview with Ouest France newspaper. âI have nothing against Claire Tabouret or contemporary stained glass … But I am in favour of them when the old ones are destroyed or damaged. You canât remove stained glass windows that are listed as historic monuments,â Bern said.
âWhy does the state set itself free from the rules it imposes on others? Just because the president wants it that way?â
Simon-Marq will make the six new windows, which will reach 7m high and cover a total surface area of 121 sq metres, and are expected to be installed in 2026. Tabouret said she would be incorporating motifs from Viollet-le-Ducâs windows in the stained glass.